MULLANEY v. MONTANA STATE FUND - Leagle.com
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:19:09 GMT+00:00
Leagle.com Dr. Smith noted that he is a trained work place injury prevention specialist with Future Industrial Technologies/Backsafe and has 12 years' experience in ...

NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. I.H.C. - Leagle.com
Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:22:16 GMT+00:00
Leagle.com As an employee of Catholic Charities, she has done extensive work for DYFS in risk evaluations. In this case, she conducted risk assessments of both parents ...

AXIS INSURANCE COMPANY v. INNOVATION VENTURES, LLC - Leagle.com
Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:26:54 GMT+00:00
Leagle.com Bodily Injury caused by the use of any product . . . 12. violations of the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, any state blue sky ...

Please, I would like someone to check my English (2)?
Q. 11.Notify your superior prior to leaving your workplace. (You have to change the bathroom slippers before going into the bathroom.) (After using them, be sure to disinfect them with alcohol.) 12.You need permission to enter other areas. (Through accidents prevention and secret information leaks.) 13.Notify your superior and receive his approval prior to your going away. 14.Do not change the clothes or do return preparation before the chimes ring. (After the chimes ring, put your affairs in order and go back.) 15.When you leave the workplace, greet your superiors and co-workers. (Put your private clothes on at the dressing-room until go home. Getting home wearing workplace clothes is not permitted.) (Do check out procedures… [cont.]
Asked by Cris - Mon Dec 18 22:34:16 2006 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments

A. 13.Notify your superior and receive his approval prior to your going away. This would sound better as "Notify your superior and receive his approval prior to leaving." (Put your workplace clothes on at the dressing-room until go home. Getting home wearing workplace clothes is not permitted.) (Follow check out procedures using the timecard located at the employees entrance.) (Only smoke at the designated location.) This should say "(Leave your street clothes in the dressing room until it's time to go home. Wearing your uniform home is not permitted)." The rest sounded fine! Good job!
Answered by Lisa E - Mon Dec 18 22:43:42 2006

U.S., after long ban, quietly begins to study gun safety, Will Health Care Reform Regulate Guns?
Q. For a decade, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been forbidden by Congress from doing research on gun-control issues. Such piddling hurdles as federal law don't matter to the Obama administration. With a wave of a hand, the CDC has simply redefined gun-control research so the ban no longer applies. They're not researching guns; they're researching alcohol sales and their impact on gun violence, or researching how teens carrying guns affect the rates of non-gun injuries. "These particular grants do not address gun control; rather they deal with the surrounding web of circumstances," wrote National Institutes of Health (NIH) spokesman Don Ralbovsky. Health care reform, which seems completely innocuous to gun rights at… [cont.]
Asked by Gadfly - Tue Apr 6 02:37:51 2010 - - 9 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Amazing how "brilliant" this plan was, with Obamas name on it, but ordered by his "shadow supporters". Been waiting for this, the declaration that "owning a gun is hazardous to your health". It IS gun control by any name, but where they will win, is in the "taxes" they will pour on the gun industry. Imagine a Glock 9mm selling for $2,500.00, or an S&W .38, Standard for $1,000.00. Add in the "taxed" ammunition, where your paying hundreds of dollars for 50 rounds and you have effective gun control, since most people couldn't afford it. Since these are "taxes", the IRS would be the enforcement agency. Making ALL gun and ammunition purchases be recorded and sent to the IRS, so the "taxes" can be paid, also "identifies" who has guns. It… [cont.]
Answered by Legion of 8 - Tue Apr 6 03:00:23 2010